Thursday, July 09, 2009

Obama's roaming eye....


Then he realizes he is being photgraphed....


he is not to happy as it appears Sarkoszy has set him up!!! The thing that is not funny about this is that had it been Bush with the roaming eye it would be all the news all the time... Heaven forbid this be underage woman he is looking at!!!

Update: Ah, now i know why the left is saying he wasn't looking... the young lady is indeed young... 16 years old, a junior delegate from Brazil....

6 comments:

RJ STRITTMATTER said...

This has been taken completely out of context.

If you watch the whole video, and not a single frame or it, like Greta Van Susteren did this morning on Fox News, you would see that the President is in motion and helping the young lady in the black top and light colored skirt standing above and behind him down the stairs.

What Sarkoszy is looking at, I can only imagine. He plays by them 'French Rules,' y'know?

Kirbside said...

I have seen the video and I am not convinced that he wasnt still checking her out.

Hell, Democrats, what the big deal? you think it is cool for president to have sex in the oval office with interms....

RJ STRITTMATTER said...

Hell, Neo-Cons, you think it's cool for John Ensign to get his mommy & daddy to pay off his mistress and for Mark Sanford to take off to Argentina for a few days....

You probably think Stephen Colbert Report is a news program and don't even realize that he's making fun of you....

Kirbside said...

RJ, you are so funny... atleast be an individual and not just another liberal drone.

I despise all people who do not take their vows seriously...

many liberals on the otherhand only find sex scandals when conservatives are involved... when democrats are, it is merely "private matters", or their is nothing to see, move on....

RJ STRITTMATTER said...

The Drudge Report takes a photo so far out of context with the intent of embarrassing the President that even Greta debunked it but you're still running with it.

Who's the smear-mongering drone now?

Democrats have a tendency to resign (Clinton being an exception) when their sex scandals come to light (Spitzer and McGreevy come to mind) - but Vitter, Ensign, and Sanford are all still in office and are showing now signs of stepping down even though they were very vocal when calling for Clinton's resignation.

Looks to me like the Morality-and-Family-Values party has a really hard time putting their money where their mouths are....

...or maybe that's why Sarah Palin decided to resign? Was she feeling messianic and decided to sacrifice herself for the world's (or her party's) sins?

I'm sorry, that was a cheap shot: We all know she just can't stand the heat and knew it was time for her to flee from the kitchen.

Kirbside said...

wow...

moral equivalence...

once again, how about tailoring your responses to me, and not just a set piece from your "minders"

I have already mentioned that i think all of them should be gone.

Now as to my "smear". How am I smearing Obama when the left finds nothing wrong with his actions? If you have no moral standards how can I smear you?

once again, have seen the tape, i just do not agree that he wasnt looking.

Looking at it now I would change what I wrote under the pictures...

Now, instead of him being mad at Sarkozy for setting him up I think he is scoulding Sarkozy for being to obvious...

"Damn man, Be cool"

But he was looking.

Once again, what is the big deal if your party is the "if it feels good do it" party?